CISI CFC · Cram Sheet

Last-night review · Print A4 · Every high-frequency fact from all 7 chapters
← Back to quiz

Exam-day cram sheet

All 50 exam questions distributed as: Ch 1 · 5Ch 2 · 8Ch 3 · 6Ch 4 · 15Ch 5 · 4Ch 6 · 8Ch 7 · 4. Ch 4 (CDD/EDD/SDD/PEPs/SARs) is by far the heaviest — allocate revision accordingly.

Ch 1a · FATF + evaluations

FATF founded1989 · G7 · Paris
StandardsThe "40 Recommendations" (2012 rev)
Mutual eval dimensionsTechnical + Effectiveness (11 IOs)
Grey list"Increased monitoring" — action plan
Black list"Call for action" — DPRK, Iran, Myanmar
UAE grey periodMar 2022 → Feb 2024
FSRBs9 · ~200 jurisdictions
ML scale (IMF)2-5% of global GDP
Trap: mutual evaluation is BOTH technical compliance AND effectiveness — not just "are laws on the books."

Ch 1b · EU MLDs 1-6

1MLD 1991Drug proceeds only · banks only
2MLD 2001All serious crime + non-financial
3MLD 2005Risk-based approach introduced
4MLD 2015-17RBA formalised · BO registers · dom. PEPs
5MLD 2018-20Crypto · prepaid cards · art · letting
6MLD 202122 predicates · legal persons · 4y min
AMLR + AMLARegulation replaces Directive · AMLA op. 2025
Trap: 4MLD = RBA + BO registers. 5MLD = crypto + art dealers. Don't swap them.

Ch 1c · UN + international bodies

Vienna 1988UN · criminalise ML of drug proceeds
Palermo 2000 (UNTOC)UN · organised crime · 3 protocols
UNCAC 2003Only binding global anti-corruption
UN sanctions basisChapter VII UN Charter · binding all
Egmont Group160+ FIUs · founded 1995 · SAR sharing
Wolfsberg Group12+ private banks · CBDDQ
OECD (AML)Anti-Bribery '97 · CRS '14 · CARF '27
Trap: Egmont = FIUs (public). Wolfsberg = banks (private). Don't confuse.

Ch 1d · National frameworks + RBA

UK anchorPOCA 2002 · TA 2000 · MLR 2017 · SAMLA 2018
UK supervisorsFCA · HMRC · OPBAS · ~22 pro bodies
US anchorBSA 1970 · PATRIOT 2001 · AMLA 2020
UAE anchorFed Decree-Law 20/2018 (am. 26/2021)
RBA cascadeFATF → NRA → sector → firm → customer
JMLIT (UK)NCA + banks · public-private intel
Trap: UK AML supervision is FRAGMENTED (FATF criticism). Not just the FCA.

Ch 2a · POCA principal offences (s.327-329)

s.327Concealing / disguising / converting / transferring / removing
s.328Arrangements — "helpers" facilitating
s.329Acquisition · use · possession
Applies toAnyone (not just regulated sector)
Max sentence14 years imprisonment
Mens reaKnowledge OR suspicion
Trap: s.329 has "adequate consideration" defence — buying at market value in good faith. Not available for s.327 or s.328.

Ch 2b · POCA regulated-sector + TF

s.330Failure to disclose (regulated sector)
s.331Failure to disclose (nominated officer)
s.333ATipping off (regulated sector)
s.342Prejudicing an investigation
Terrorism Act 2000s.15-18 TF offences · s.19-21 disclosure
All crimes principleAny predicate offence · no de-minimis
Trap: "objective test" for s.330 failure-to-disclose — did you have REASONABLE GROUNDS to suspect? Not just what you actually thought.

Ch 3a · Stages + traditional typologies

Stage 1Placement — get cash into system
Stage 2Layering — obscure origin (many trans.)
Stage 3Integration — clean funds appear legit
Structuring / smurfingBreak into <threshold amounts
Cash businessesBars · car washes · nail salons · scrap
Trade-based MLOver/under-invoicing · phantom shipments
Money mulesRecruited to move funds (often unwitting)
Trap: "the three stages" question — memorise the ORDER (placement → layering → integration) and one example of each.

Ch 3b · Modern + emerging typologies

Crypto mixersTornado Cash (sanctioned OFAC 2022)
Cross-chain bridgesConvert one chain to another to break trail
Privacy coinsMonero, Zcash (many exchanges delisted)
NFT wash-tradingSelf-trade to fake volume + launder
Ransomware paymentsColonial Pipeline 2021 · big-game hunting
Sanctions evasion post-2022Russia · shell cos in third countries · gold
Real estateUltimate integration channel · LonRes UK
Trap: DPRK Lazarus Group behind biggest 2022-24 crypto thefts ($1bn+). State-sponsored TF/ML is major exam theme.

Ch 4a · CDD triggers + tiers

CDD triggersNew relationship · occasional trans. ≥€15k · suspicion · doubt about data
Standard CDDIdentify + verify · BO · purpose
SDDLower risk · limited verification
EDD triggersPEPs · high-risk 3rd countries · complex/unusual · correspondent bank
BO threshold25% ownership OR control (default)
Ongoing monitoringTrans. scrutiny · CDD refresh
Trap: BO threshold is 25% by default but can be LOWER for higher-risk cases — always check the firm's own risk-based policy.

Ch 4b · PEPs + SARs + MLRO

PEP definitionProminent public function · high-corruption-risk
PEP scope (4MLD+)Foreign AND domestic (broadened)
PEP family/close assoc.Also subject to EDD
PEP status durationMin 12 months after leaving office
SAR = UKSuspicious Activity Report · to NCA
STR = elsewhereSuspicious Transaction Report
DAML requestConsent request — NCA has 7 workdays
MLRO roleNominated officer · sole authority to submit SAR
Trap: senior mgmt approval REQUIRED to onboard/continue PEP relationships — not just the relationship manager's call.

Ch 5 · Terrorist financing

TF vs MLML hides bad money · TF funds bad acts
TF fund sourcesCan be LEGITIMATE (donations, salary) or illegitimate
TF amountsOften small · below thresholds
UK statuteTerrorism Act 2000 · s.15-18 offences
Detection difficultySmall transactions · legitimate-looking
UN 1267 regimeAl-Qaida/ISIL sanctions list · binding
NGO / charity riskDiversion of funds to armed groups
Trap: TF funds don't have to come from crime — a salary donated to a terrorist organisation is still TF. Focus on DESTINATION, not source.

Ch 6a · Bribery + fraud

UK Bribery Act 20104 offences · s.7 corporate failure to prevent
s.7 defence"Adequate procedures" (6 principles)
US FCPA 1977Bribery of foreign public officials · SEC/DOJ enforce
Facilitation paymentsIllegal under UKBA · limited FCPA exception
Fraud Act 2006By representation · by failing to disclose · by abuse of position
UK ECCT 2023Failure-to-prevent-fraud offence (Sept 2025)
Trap: UKBA has NO facilitation-payment exception. FCPA has a narrow one — but modern enforcement discourages use.

Ch 6b · Sanctions + tax + market abuse

UK sanctionsOFSI · SAMLA 2018 · strict liability (Jun 2022)
US sanctionsOFAC · SDN list · US persons/USD/US goods
EU sanctionsCouncil Regulations · direct effect
Tax evasion (UK)Criminal Finances Act 2017 · CCO offence
MAR (EU/UK)Market Abuse Reg · insider dealing · manip.
Insider info testPrecise · non-public · price-sensitive
Off-channel comms$2bn+ fines · WhatsApp/text scandal 2022+
Trap: UK OFSI moved to STRICT LIABILITY for sanctions breaches in June 2022 — no need to show intent. Higher enforcement risk.

Ch 7 · Recent developments

FATF Rec 15 (2019)VASPs covered · same AML as banks
Travel RuleOriginator + beneficiary info with transfer
Travel Rule threshold$/€1,000 (FATF · some jurisdictions lower)
MiCA (EU)Crypto regulation · in force 2024-25
EU AMLAOperational 2025 · direct EU supervisor
US CTA (part of AMLA 2020)BO reporting to FinCEN · legal-challenge delays
UK ECCT 2023Corp criminal · identification doctrine reform
AI in FC detectionML models · false-positive reduction
Trap: FATF Travel Rule threshold is $/€1,000 but individual jurisdictions may apply lower or zero — check local rule. UK VASPs use €1,000 for most, £0 for cross-border.

Exam-day metadata

Format50 MCQs · 60 minutes
Pass mark70% (35/50)
DeliveryComputer-based · Pearson VUE
Ch 4 weight15/50 questions (~30%) — dominant
Ch 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 combined19/50 questions (framework + typologies + TF + recent)
Ch 2 + 6 combined16/50 questions (offences + other crimes)
"EXCEPT" questionsRead carefully · tick the ODD one out
Multi-select (e.g. "all of the following")Verify EVERY option before answering
Strategy: spend 40 of the 60 minutes on Ch 4 material — CDD/EDD/SDD, PEPs, SARs, MLRO. It's 30% of the exam and everything else you can revise in half the time.